Published on May 4, 2026

HOKA Zinal 3 Review: Back to the Future

Written by
Alex Filitti Meta Circle
Alex Filitti
Andy
Andy Wright
Josh corporate picture
Joshua Burton
Esther
Ivan
Ivan Corda
Maisie Ogier
Silke Lehrmann
Theo Lothode
Tim
Tim Alvado-Brette
Lysanne Wilkens
Rosana Ercilla
Raoul de Jongh
Thys Moreau
Lucie Dejonghe

Extremely nimble, light and fun to run in

Excellent lockdown and fit which may be a little snug for some

A lovely, buttery smooth midsole feel

Maybe limited in its usage over longer distances

SPECS

Sometimes, we need to gamble. We need that risk to know we are alive. To buck the trend. With the Zinal 3, HOKA needed to gamble. The Zinal 2’s identity crisis still lingers. Is this a shoe for new HOKA clients or a specific workout shoe for existing HOKA clients? 

HOKA clearly went back to the drawing board and came back with something very exciting to run in. A lot has changed in 2.5 years since the Zinal 2 was released, much of that in the midsole of running shoes today. Have HOKA created a throwback shoe? Or, is a new category emerging alongside the Scott Kinabalu Trail for low profile, narrow, fun and fast shoes that challenge the trend of more is more? My head went expecting the shoe to feel like a Salomon Sense 7 SG or a Puma FAAS 250 trail, but I was so wrong. We’ve come a long way (in midsoles), baby. 

Another gamble for HOKA is the Vibram-to-proprietary outsole switch. Is the combination with a race-level foam better than the old EVA + Vibram solution? 

This shoe held many questions when I received it. Many gambles for HOKA. Let’s dig into what worked and what did not work for me.

Upper and Fit of the HOKA Zinal 3

What works for me

The Zinal 3 returns to a traditional lacing system after the Zinal 2’s experimental sock-like entry. The flat laces run through reinforced eyelets and hold tension well without feeling overly tight. So far the lockdown is solid. The upper holds your foot close and firm without being tight — a significant improvement over the previous generation. This also leads to a better heel lockdown with the heel cup cradling the foot securely. This is noticeable even on steep ascents and descents. There is light internal padding that prevents any hot spots so far, without adding any unnecessary bulk. 

The upper is built around a Leno Weave construction — a specialised technique where the threads are twisted together rather than simply stacked. This creates a fabric that resists lateral stretch (keeping your foot locked in place during hard cornering or cambered trails) while remaining extremely breathable. The fabric feels techy and light and I cannot fault it in any way so far. 

The collar height sits right at the ankle bone. Low enough to allow full range of motion on technical terrain but high enough to prevent debris entry. Combined with the gusseted tongue, the ankle area feels secure without being restrictive. The structured build means no unwanted lateral movement when running on off-camber trails.

The Zinal 3 will be too narrow for many feet but suits my feet perfectly, so I am going to include it in the what works for me piece, with a caveat that the shoe is very narrow.

What doesn’t work for me

I have nothing to add here. The upper on the Zinal 3 is stellar in all ways. I word on sizing and the width of the shoe here. 

The shoe is suited to those with narrow feet. Yes, there is the new HOKA Dynamic Vamp on the forefoot, a stretch zone that expands both vertically and horizontally as your feet swell. Still, humans with wider feet will not find happy feet in this shoe. 

The shoe runs a little short, like most HOKA models. My usual 46 is a 46 ⅔ in HOKA and I would apply your previous HOKA sizing to this model.

Midsole and Ride of the HOKA Zinal 3

What works for me

The headline upgrade: HOKA has replaced the old standard EVA with a Supercritical Nitrogen-Injected Foam. This is the same high-performance compound found in HOKA’s top-tier racing shoes like the Tecton X line. By injecting nitrogen into the foam while it’s in a supercritical state, the resulting material is significantly more resilient, lighter, and bouncier than conventional EVA. This sounds like the evolution we need and it is, 100% the evolution from Zinal 2 to Zinal 3 that will revive this shoe line.

The Zinal 3 features a stack height of 31.8 mm at the heel and 26.8 mm at the forefoot. This represents a modest increase of approximately 1.8 mm over the Zinal 2. This design choice maintains a close-to-the-ground profile, which is key for preserving trail feel and proprioception. The midsole compresses in a controlled, linear fashion. The density of the foam absorbs impact firmly rather than mushily. You feel connected to the shoe, as well as the ground. There is a lot of feeling of control with this midsole. The rocker is mild and progressive – designed to assist forward momentum. No exaggerated feelings of a pronounced rocker here. The transition from heel through midfoot to toe-off is smooth, consistent and reliable. 

It is less aggressive than the Tecton, but gives more control on uneven footing.

The Zinal 3 truly shines in the decompression phase. Energy return is significantly better than other low profile shoes I have run in. The word ‘pop’ will enter your mind as you fly along in the Zinal 3, a firm reminder that the days of EVA in performance footwear are limited. If we are going to argue for an Adidas Evo SL on the trail, perhaps this is the first shoe I would put in that category. 

The midsole look gives an unavoidable ‘throwback’ look but the execution is anything but a throwback. The shoe is dynamic, predictable fun. Yes, you can slot your feet into smaller spaces and yes, the grounding on this shoe shines. Yes you will feel rocks, roots and other trail elements more than in a 40mm stack shoe. No, it does not change my love for this midsole.

What doesn’t work for me

As long as I use this shoe for its intended purpose (shorter outings, medium to technical terrain) I do not have much to add here. 

My smallest dissatisfaction with the midsole is that it feels a little boring at lower speeds. During warm-up and on the recovery run I did in them, the midsole was telling me that I had other shoes for this purpose. The Zinal 3 wants to play all the time.

Outsole of the HOKA Zinal 3

Grip and Traction

HOKA has replaced the previous Vibram Megagrip with their own proprietary sticky rubber compound, paired with deeper 5 mm lugs (up from 4 mm). On dry hardpack, gravel, and rocky terrain, the grip is excellent — the deeper lugs bite well and the rubber compound provides confident traction. The lug pattern is multi-directional, offering reliable grip on both ascents and descents. Combined with the narrow nature of the shoe, it should drop down into mud and find grip a lot better than wide platforms with short lugs. 

The proprietary rubber appears to be reasonably durable on mixed terrain — rocky trails, hardpack, and gravel haven’t caused premature wear in early testing. The deeper lugs do mean there’s more material to wear through before grip is compromised. That said, softer “sticky” rubber compounds tend to wear faster than harder formulations, so high-mileage runners on abrasive surfaces (tarmac connectors, sharp volcanic rock) should expect outsole wear before the midsole gives out. 

Durability

So far, the Zinal 3 shows no signs of wear and tear. Neither the upper, midsole or outsole are showing any signs of degradation but I have run extremely limited tarmac and sharp rocky trails in them. Esther might have better insights here, so read on below for her conclusions. 

Conclusion

Value for Money

HOKA have put this shoe in at €160, which puts it firmly in the world of daily trainers. Somehow I had this at €140 for the entire time I tested the shoe and wrote this review and now it’s messing with my head. The shoe feels premium and runs fast. It’s a race shoe which there is always a premium for. Esther and I discussed the economics of Vibram vs the perceived value fairly robustly in the review of the Zinal 3, which adds to my conundrum.

I love this shoe at €140 ex Vibram and I think at €170 including a Vibram Megagrip Litebase outsole they would have a winner too, but at €160 with the proprietary outsole I’m less excited. As an end consumer, the €30 premium for an outsole I really trust is worth it every time. At €140 it’s a compelling offer. The value is ‘ok’ for me at €160 but I believe that €140 would have been the mark to hit.

Fitting it into a shoe rotation

Car boot shoes for me. Short, tempo runs would be ideal from the trail head with a solid 45-90min outing in mind. Focus on moderate to technical trails with the bigger lugs and a shoe for when you want a strong grounding and a lot of trail feel. You feel connected to the environment in the HOKA Zinal 3.

Final Verdict

The Zinal 3 is a mature, well-rounded evolution. It corrects the Zinal 2’s identity crisis, brings race-level foam technology to a very competitive price point, and delivers a versatile shoe that works from fast training days to race day. The Vibram-to-proprietary outsole switch is the one gamble — grip on wet rock needs more real-world data — but the overall package makes this one of the most compelling trail shoes for 2026.

Comparisons Against Similar Shoes

Hoka Zinal 3 vs. Scott Kinabalu Trail

The Zinal 3 gives a more lively ride than the Kinabalu Trail with both shoes having extremely good uppers in terms of lockdown and durability. The Zinal 3 shows more promise in midsole durability and ground feel is a little more pronounced, but the midsole ride on the Zinal 3 makes it a more enjoyable shoe overall. 

Hoka Zinal 3 vs. Rossignol Venosk

The narrow, stripped back fit of the Zinal 3 is rather reminiscent of the Rossignol Venosk we reviewed here a while ago. The Zinal 3 is perhaps a smidge more protective and has a little more rebound than the Venosk. The Venosk is more customisable with two removable insoles for dialed in fit and sizing. The Venosk has just a little extra space for metatarsals too. The grip on the Zinal 3 might not outlast that of the Venosk, but its lugs are arguably more aggressive on muddy terrain. Then again, the Zinal 3 will set you back by €20 over the Venosk on release day.

Other People’s Takes on the HOKA Zinal 3

Esther’s Take on the HOKA Zinal 3

Are these even HOKAs? The Zinal 3 is the most stripped-back and narrow shoe I have tried from this brand. It’s possibly the lightest as well. Any trail shoe under 190gr in my size is an instant head turner. This model feels like a departure from HOKA’s usual identity of high stacks and maximal cushioning, a bit like the Jawz and the Torrent once were. This time round, the uniqueness of being able to feel the ground without your legs barking is precisely what makes the Zinal 3 feel so special.

This is a joy-filled, race-oriented shoe for lighter runners. It’s one of those summery shoes that almost invites you to run barefoot. It’s a reminder of old school low profile running shoes but with some bounce. I found protection to be minimal but honestly sufficient for a committed trail runner, thanks to a small rock plate that takes the edge off. Despite the low profile, the overall sensation remains buttery smooth and comfortable. 

In response to Raoul’s comment about the shoe feeling dull at slower paces, my experience was somewhat different. I ran in the Zinal 3 across a range of efforts and distances, and consistently found them lively and enjoyable. You almost forget you have shoes on. Beyond 20 kilometres though, I’ll be the first to admit that the Zinal 3 are a little hard on the knees. As Raoul said, long distances were never what this shoe was designed for.

Highlights for me include the upper, particularly the stretchy, soft tongue, which adapts neatly to the shape of the foot. The narrower platform is another strength, making it simple to navigate with precision over roots and rocks rather than catching them. I have missed that in a number of new trail shoes.

On the downside, the proprietary HOKA midsole feels like a cost-saving choice compared to a Vibram option that may affect long-term durability. The outsole rubber itself is soft and lugs are deep, but I have already noticed early signs of lug shredding, which is not something I want before the 100-kilometre mark. 

Given its highly specific use, I would have liked to see the price come down by around 20 euros. At 140 euros, it would feel like excellent value and a perfect companion for afterwork mountain sessions, nervous singletracks and VKs.

AUTHORS
Alex Filitti Meta Circle
Alex Filitti

31 years old

Marathon

2:49:25
Andy
Andy Wright
46 years old

Marathon

2:44:06

Josh corporate picture
Joshua Burton
23 years old

Half Marathon

1:09:00

Esther
43 years old
Ivan
Ivan Corda
48 years old

Marathon

31:20

Lysanne Wilkens
48 years old

10km

33:48

Silke Lehrmann
50 years old

Marathon

4:04

Maisie Ogier
33 years old

Marathon

3:30:13

Theo Lothode
30 years old

Marathon

2:34

Tim
Tim Alvado-Brette
30 years old
Marathon
2:34
Rosana Ercilla

22 years old

Marathon
2:34
Raoul de Jongh

46 years old

Marathon
2:34
Thys Moreau

23 years old

Half Marathon
1:05:42
Lucie Dejonghe

22 years old

10K
47:50

Related articles