Published on April 4, 2025

ASICS Trabuco Series Comparison: Is More Always Better?

Written by
Alex Filitti Meta Circle
Alex Filitti
Andy
Andy Wright
Josh corporate picture
Josh Burton
Esther
Ivan
Ivan Corda
Maisie Ogier
Silke Lehrmann
Theo Lothode
Tim
Tim Alvado-Brette
Lysanne Wilkens

ASICS Trabuco Series Comparison

Just in time for your Spring trail running, ASICS brings two tempting options to the table: the Trabuco Max 4 and the Trabuco 13. While they share the same name, these models each offer distinct features and benefits. After recently reviewing the Trabuco Max 4 and the Trabuco 13, here at Meta Endurance, we’re comparing these shoes. The comparison is based on their fit, cushioning, midsole technology, outsole performance, and overall versatility. We’re here to help you choose the right one for your trails.

Finding the right fit for you in the Trabuco series

Esther: The fit of the Trabuco Max 4 is snug and supportive. A thicker jacquard-woven mesh upper provides a secure fit, which many runners will appreciate. After my long run today, I noticed how the mesh felt like a tightly protected bubble around my foot. Meanwhile, the overall foot was held in place allowing for good stability. The Max 4 excels in stability, gently guiding the foot back when it begins to wander, especially after a longer effort.

In contrast, the Trabuco 13 offers a more relaxed fit, particularly in the forefoot area. I was surprised by the amount of room in the toe box. So much so that I double-checked both shoes to ensure they were the same size! This roominess could be attributed to perhaps a flatter last or at least a little less support in the arch area. The Trabuco 13 is lower cut than its more cushioned cousin. This may get you reaching for the extra eyelet for a more secure fit. The upper of the Trabuco 13 uses a perforated ripstop material, offering a lighter, more breathable feel compared to the taught Max 4 jacquard mesh.

Both shoes feature a minimal toe cap, which might seem like a concern at first. However, it does do its job pretty well. Each shoe also comes with the same plush heel counter, a semi-gusseted tongue, an elastic lace storage tab. Furthermore, they pack an extra eyelet for added security. Both models utilise a wire system for a more precise lockdown.

In summary, the Trabuco Max 4 focuses on delivering a stable and protective fit in a snug package, where the Trabuco 13 offers a more relaxed, comfortable fit with plenty of room for your toes to move freely.

One foam, two distinct feels

Esther: The Trabuco Max 4 features ASICS’ FF Blast+ ECO midsole, offering a firm, stable ride with solid protection. Despite its “max” label, it prioritises stability and durability over squishy cushioning, with moderate bounce but no soft, plush feel. The shoe is surprisingly light for its stack height, providing decent support for heel strikers. However, it may disappoint those looking for a plush bouncy ride. What it lacks in cushion, it makes up for with a forefoot rocker that helps propel runners through flat and uphill sections.

The Trabuco 13, on the other hand, delivers a much more dynamic, responsive, snappy feel. Its FF Blast+ foam strikes a perfect balance between cushioning and energy return, offering a lively, bouncy ride without wasting energy. The addition of a thinner rockplate offers protection without sacrificing the feel of the terrain. While both shoes feature similar foam, the Trabuco 13 is remarkably more responsive and playful, making it a great choice for short to middle distances.

Both shoes promise you’ll be out there for many hours, but the ride of the two is diametrically in opposition. TheTrabuco Max 4 has a 5mm drop and is built for longer, mid-to-long trail runs, especially for those seeking stability, comfort, and protection. Its firmer midsole and moderate cushioning offer durability for extended hours on the trails. The high stack height provides extra cushioning, making it ideal for heavier runners or heel strikers. The toe rocker really helps keep you moving. However, it’s not the most playful shoe on the market, especially for runners looking for a quick trail outing or speed sessions.

On the other hand, the Trabuco 13 is a versatile, bouncy, playful shoe with an 8mm drop. The new FF Blast+ midsole offers a dynamic ride suitable for a wide range of trail conditions. The shoe performs well on rocky, gravelly, and forested trails, while the improved traction provides extra confidence on downhills and technical sections. It’s a great all-around shoe for runners who value both comfort and performance on a variety of terrains. The Trabuco 13 is more adaptable than the Trabuco Max 4, offering more flexibility and fun for lighter runners who want responsiveness and versatility.

Y outperforms M in the Trabuco series

Esther: Both shoes use grippy Asicsgrip rubber on their outsoles with what looks like 4mm lugs. The difference is all in a letter. Or rather in the design of the lugs. The Trabuco Max 4 organises its lugs in M-shapes. The Max 4 did fine on buffed out trails, on dry terrain or rocks but struggled in wet or muddy conditions. On my wet runs, the shallow M-lugs tended to get clogged with mud, making the shoe slippery in boggy environments.

In contrast, the Trabuco 13 is much more ready to tackle technical terrain, using multidirectional Y-shaped chevron lugs that hook the elements so much better. This is a major update from its predecessor, and a significant performance upgrade from its Max 4 cousin!

Is the Max or the regular the right choice for you?

Esther: Ultimately, the choice between the Trabuco Max 4 and the Trabuco 13 boils down to personal preferences and perhaps trail distance. For those seeking a firmly cushioned and stable ride, the Max 4 is a great option. The rocker is sure to help you get to your goal. For those looking for versatility, responsiveness, and a more dynamic experience, look no further than the Trabuco 13. While it might not provide the same level of lockdown and arch support as the Trabuco Max 4, it’s an excellent all-around trail shoe for most runners, especially those who want comfort, speed, and grip on almost any terrain.

AUTHORS
Alex Filitti Meta Circle
Alex Filitti

30 years old

Marathon

2:49:25
Andy
Andy Wright
46 years old

Marathon

2:44:06

Josh corporate picture
Josh Burton
21 years old

10km

31:20

Esther
43 years old
Ivan
Ivan Corda
48 years old

Marathon

31:20

Lysanne Wilkens
48 years old

10km

33:48

Silke Lehrmann
50 years old

Marathon

4:04

Maisie Ogier
33 years old

Marathon

3:30:13

Theo Lothode
30 years old

Marathon

2:34

Tim
Tim Alvado-Brette
30 years old
Marathon
2:34

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related articles